Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

Alhaji Sheshe V. Alhaji Ibrahim (2020) CLR 4(h) (SC)

Judgement delivered on April 24th, 2020

Brief

  • Finding of fact
  • Specific finding of fact in a judgment -Where not appealed
  • Leave to appeal
  • Rules of court
  • High Court of Kano State Rules
  • Unchallenged and undisputed fact
  • Duties of legal practitioner
  • Undefended list procedure - Purpose of
  • Section 233(2) of the 1999 Constitution
  • Section 233(3) of the 1999 Constitution
  • Rule 30 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007
  • Rule 15(2) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners 2007

Facts

The respondent was the plaintiff at the trial High Court of Kano State. He had brought his suit against the appellant, as the defendant, on the undefended list procedure claiming the liquidated sums -N6,550,000.00 made up of N6,400,000.00 as purchase price for a plot the defendant/appellant purportedly sold to him and which sale eventually turned out to be a mere hoax. The additional sum of N150,000.00 was demanded and received from the plaintiff/respondent for the perfection of title over the plot of land in favour of the illiterate plaintiff/respondent. The appellants had no title over the plot he allegedly sold to the respondent. A third party’s title to and over the plot was later confirmed by the Ministry of lands and Physical Planning; and N13,900,000.00 friendly loan the respondent had advanced to the appellant to reflate his business. The transaction was witnessed in writing by exhibit H4.

The liquidated sums of N6,400,000.00 and N150,000.00 were sums or money had and received for a failed contract or inter alia that he “did not and has never entered into any agreement to pay or refund any money to the” respondent.

The trial court, not impressed by the appellant’s dribbling skills on the undefended list procedure, entered judgment against him in the sum of N20,450,000.00 in favour of the respondent. The Court of Appeal (the lower court) dismissed his appeal against the decision of the trial court. In this further appeal the appellant articulates his grievances yet again.

Issues

Whether the Court of Appeal was right to affirm the judgment of the High Courtt...

Read More